shouldn't it says © 2007...not © 2006...I'd change it but the page is protected.--RyanB88 11:20, 9 February 2007 (PST) Well now it should say 2008. Also *some* creative commons license do not require attribution, but all the new versions do.--22.214.171.124 10:46, 4 March 2008 (PST)
GPL, LGPL, or GFDL (including Wikipedia, Wikisource, Wikibooks, and coDEVwiki content)
 and WTFPL ?
Your article should talk about the WTFPL (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL ), which is *very* permissive license. Although it seems a joke license, it has really been used : http://freshmeat.net/browse/1008/ , http://www.ohloh.net/projects/search?q=wtfpl
 Creative Commons CC0
Should this transition be mentioned on this LiteratePrograms:Copyrights? If there has been a big discussion elsewhere, please post a simple link to that discussion, rather than re-hash all the points here again. --DavidCary (talk) 21:40, 13 April 2013 (UTC)hijackerhijacker