User contributions
From LiteratePrograms
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
- 08:00, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) m LiteratePrograms:Public forum (→Indentation bug) (top)
- 07:59, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) LiteratePrograms:Public forum (indentation bug)
- 07:49, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) LiteratePrograms:Public forum (→Python imports)
- 07:37, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Word count (Python) (→The main program - OK, checked the open questions and fixed the code (maybe there's a better way than checking the OS?)) (top)
- 07:21, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) User:Ce (→My Articles - update date of latest update) (top)
- 07:20, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) User:Ce (→Articles where I made substantial contributions - update)
- 07:18, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Word count (Python) (→The main program - It didn't work this way. All but the first line are wrongly indented. Leaving comment in and extra indenting code to give consistent indenting for both presentation and code.)
- 07:13, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Word count (Python) (→The main program - literateprograms messes up indentation in the generated code; I hope that comment helps not triggering that bug)
- 07:09, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Word count (Python) (→The main program - literated a bit more)
- 06:37, 8 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Word count (Python) (Literated a bit more (still very much a code dump))
- 21:37, 6 May 2010 (hist) (diff) Literate Programming Tool (Literate Programming Tool moved to Literate Programming Tool (Python): adapted to LP conventions) (top)
- 21:37, 6 May 2010 (hist) (diff) m Literate Programming Tool (Python) (Literate Programming Tool moved to Literate Programming Tool (Python): adapted to LP conventions) (top)
- 17:55, 2 October 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Goldbach's Conjecture (Haskell) (why exclude 2?) (top)
- 10:06, 20 September 2009 (hist) (diff) m Turing machine simulator (Unlambda) (→The main loop - typo in description) (top)
- 10:02, 20 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→User-defined types - expanded a bit) (top)
- 18:17, 5 September 2009 (hist) (diff) Hello World (bash) (reverted modification, split codeblock to pair code with explanation, and added explanation for use of env) (top)
- 19:23, 25 August 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Variables and types - again a bit more)
- 17:11, 16 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Variables and types - again a bit more)
- 19:12, 9 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Variables and types - more types)
- 19:49, 25 June 2009 (hist) (diff) User:Ce (update)
- 19:30, 25 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Variables and types - C++ basic types)
- 16:49, 3 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Basic Input and Output - Fixed codeblock end tag)
- 16:47, 3 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (Some more)
- 17:52, 22 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (Basic I/O)
- 14:32, 20 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (fixed chunk names)
- 14:29, 20 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (→Includes - Example with user header)
- 10:44, 19 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (#include)
- 18:01, 15 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (oops, how could I get that wrong ...)
- 17:59, 15 May 2009 (hist) (diff) m Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (typo)
- 17:58, 15 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (The line break after the <<...>>= seems to be required)
- 17:57, 15 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Basic constructs (C Plus Plus) (A start)
- 07:31, 6 May 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The function shortcut - Fixed another typo, replaced "x" by "lambda argument") (top)
- 07:28, 6 May 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The constant shortcut - fixed a typo, added some markup)
- 17:24, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m User:Ce (update)
- 17:23, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (The program no longer is a code dump)
- 17:21, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The function shortcut - literated)
- 16:41, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The constant shortcut - oops, inside the function, it's arg, not argument_name)
- 16:40, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The constant shortcut - Fixed another, newly introduced bug with d, literated)
- 15:47, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The constant shortcut - literated a bit more and fixed bugs in handling of d and i (e.g. ^x```i``s.a.b.c.d was mishandled))
- 14:06, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→The constant shortcut - Fixed a bug: If a nonapplied two-character function happened to use the argument character, the expression was incorrectly marked as unsafe for the constant shortcut)
- 13:57, 30 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Doing the abstraction elimination - literated a bit more)
- 16:44, 27 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Doing the abstraction elimination - literated a bit more)
- 16:43, 24 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Doing the abstraction elimination - literated a bit more)
- 07:04, 23 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Checking the validity of partial expressions - While not strictly necessary in this case, I consider the braces good style (they would be necessary if the cases defined variables))
- 17:26, 22 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Checking the validity of partial expressions - typo)
- 17:25, 22 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Checking the validity of the Unlambda + lambda expression - Added subsection headers)
- 17:18, 22 April 2009 (hist) (diff) m Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Checking the validity of the Unlambda + lambda expression - removed outdated part of comment)
- 17:06, 20 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (→Checking the validity of the Unlambda + lambda expression - literated a bit more)
- 16:14, 20 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Unlambda abstraction elimination (C Plus Plus) (improved valid_with: on successful subexpression test, level is always reduced by 1, otherwise it's ignored; therefore there's no need to pass it to recursive function calls)
- 16:34, 17 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Category:Users:Unlambda:Some (top)
(Latest | Earliest) View (previous 50) (next 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500).
